Three Polling Applications to Consider for Your Instruction
Enhancing a proven way to improve student engagement
Posted on in Blog Posts
Posted on July 31, 2023 in Blog Posts
Much has been written about ChatGPT and its potential impact on libraries and society since it gained popularity in November 2022. Librarians have brought forward concerns about the validity of the information that it produces and users’ ability to evaluate the content it produces. Some are also concerned about the potential for plagiarism, while others fear that it will replace reference librarians all together.
The question on many librarians’ minds is, Can ChatGPT actually provide reference services? It is conversational in nature, which may mimic the feeling of interacting with a person, but can it provide accurate information? We asked it four questions that were based off questions that we received on our own virtual reference service (staffed by librarians). Let’s see how it did.
CHATGPT: Hello! While I don’t have direct access to current datasets, I can provide guidance on finding the information you’re looking for. To find a dataset on church attendance rates in the US from 1950-2000, you can follow these steps:
Remember to evaluate the credibility and methodology of the sources you find. Additionally, data availability for specific years within the requested time period may vary.
A librarian would most likely be able to find the dataset in question; a quick Google search can show us that the Pew Research Center has some data on this topic, which was mentioned as a potential source in step number 3. However, ChatGPT did offer some interesting places to start looking. It suggested looking at curated datasets and repositories, but it did not offer an explanation for what they are or where to look for them. It’s notable that one of its first suggestions, the National Center for Health Statistics, does not actually include information about church attendance, but rather, uses religion as a data point that it collects in relation to health. A librarian noted that difference immediately and removed it as a potential resource suggestion.
ChatGPT wrapped up the interaction by telling the user to evaluate the credibility of the information they use, but did not recommend that they consult an expert such as a librarian.
All in all, it provided a few good starting points, but most undergraduate students would require more guidance on this topic.
CHATGPT: I’m sorry, but as an AI language model, I don’t have real-time access to the internet or the ability to browse specific websites. Therefore, I can’t provide you with the obituary of Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
However, you can easily find her obituary by conducting a search on popular news websites, such as The New York Times, The Washington Post, or CNN. These websites often have comprehensive coverage of significant events, including the passing of notable individuals like Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Additionally, you can search for her obituary using an internet search engine like Google.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, passed away on September 18, 2020. You should be able to find numerous articles and obituaries about her life, career, and contributions to the field of law during that time.
This interaction highlights the main limitations of ChatGPT 3.5: it does not have access to the internet and relies on the language model that was used to train it to respond to questions. We wondered if it would “hallucinate” (i.e., predict an answer based on its’ training model) an obituary for Ruth Bader Ginsberg, but instead, it provided some suggestions for where to search for one. While these are good suggestions, a librarian would be able to find the exact answer to this question.
🌟 Read more from LibTech Insights:
CHATGPT: When it comes to finding scientific articles and reliable consumer reports for the travel and tourism industry, there are several sources you can explore. Here are a few suggestions:
Remember to critically evaluate the credibility and methodology of the sources you find to ensure reliability and accuracy. Additionally, access to full articles or reports may sometimes require a subscription or purchase.
I hope these suggestions help you in your search for scientific articles and reliable consumer reports in the travel and tourism industry!
Once again, ChatGPT recommended databases, but much like question number 1, some of them are not relevant to the topic. PubMed and JSTOR are not relevant sources for tourism industry reports. It omitted some important sources for industry reports, such as IBISWorld, Euromonitor, Mintel, etc., and suggested that TripAdvisor, a popular review website for travel, would include some industry information (it does not). It did suggest real peer-reviewed journals from traditional publishers, such as Springer and Taylor and Francis, but did not indicate how to find them or search for them. It also recommended trade magazines and trade associations (in the form of third-party research institutions, which are broadly accurate), but it offered no follow-up on the scope of the research in question to narrow down those resources.
In this instance, it also mentioned the importance of evaluating sources critically; however, it did not provide guidance on how to do this.
CHATGPT: Certainly! When writing a paper on the fall of the Berlin Wall, it’s important to incorporate primary sources that provide firsthand accounts or original documents related to the event. Here’s a recommendation for a primary source you can consider:
The collection is available in book format and has been compiled by experts who have selected and translated key documents. It offers a valuable primary source material to understand the political context, the actions of the East German government, and the events leading up to the fall of the Berlin Wall.
Remember to analyze and contextualize the primary sources you choose in your paper, providing appropriate citations and references. Additionally, consult additional primary and secondary sources to present a comprehensive and well-rounded analysis of the topic.
Please note that availability of specific primary sources may vary, and you may need access to libraries, archives, or online databases to locate and access these materials.
CHATGPT: I apologize for the confusion. As an AI language model, I don’t have real-time access to specific books or their authors. The reference I provided earlier was a fictional example of the type of primary source that could be useful for your research.
For primary sources on the fall of the Berlin Wall, consider exploring the following types of materials:
To find specific primary sources, you may need to search through archives, libraries, or online databases that specialize in historical documents and primary sources related to the Cold War era. Institutions like the Berlin Wall Memorial, German Historical Museum, or the German Federal Archives could be helpful in locating primary sources on the subject.
Remember to cite and reference any primary sources you use properly, following the appropriate citation style for your paper.
This is perhaps the most interesting interaction and one with which many librarians will be familiar. Many of us have experienced looking up citations that do not exist and then realizing that they were created by ChatGPT. As previously mentioned, this tool predicts resources that could exist based on the large language model that was used to train it. In this case, it hallucinated a book that does not actually exist. What’s interesting is that ChatGPT won’t mention this fact; it will only say that this is an example it created when confronted by the user who cannot find it.
This fact highlights the importance for librarians to teach how to use ChatGPT effectively and to continue our work with the critical evaluation of sources and information.
🔥 Sign up for LibTech Insights (LTI) new post notifications and updates.
📅 Join us for a free webinar on AI prompt engineering for librarians.
✍️ Interested in contributing to LTI? Send an email to Deb V. at Choice with your topic idea.
Gale partners with librarians and educators to create positive change and outcomes for researchers and learners. The company empowers libraries to be active collaborators in the success of their institutions and communities by providing essential content that leads to discovery and knowledge, and user-friendly technology that delivers engaging learning experiences. For more information, please visit gale.com/academic
Enhancing a proven way to improve student engagement
Posted on in Blog Posts
Our list of user-submitted AI resources
Posted on in Blog Posts
An important distinction with room for collaboration
Posted on in Blog Posts
Teaching, learning, and using AI — all in one place
Posted on in Blog Posts